翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Criminal Justice Policy Review
・ Criminal justice reform
・ Criminal justice system of Japan
・ Criminal justice system of the Netherlands
・ Criminal law
・ Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
・ Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995
・ Criminal Law (Criminal Organisations Disruption) Amendment Act 2013
・ Criminal Law (film)
・ Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007
・ Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2006
・ Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act (Singapore)
・ Criminal Law Act
・ Criminal Law Act (Northern Ireland) 1967
・ Criminal Law Act 1826
Criminal Law Act 1967
・ Criminal Law Act 1977
・ Criminal Law Amendment Act
・ Criminal Law Amendment Act 1871
・ Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885
・ Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1968-69
・ Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997
・ Criminal law consolidation Acts 1861
・ Criminal law in the Chase Court
・ Criminal law in the Marshall Court
・ Criminal law in the Taney Court
・ Criminal law in the Waite Court
・ Criminal law of Australia
・ Criminal law of Canada
・ Criminal law of Singapore


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Criminal Law Act 1967 : ウィキペディア英語版
Criminal Law Act 1967

The Criminal Law Act 1967 (c.58) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. However, with some minor exceptions, it generally applies to only England and Wales. It made some major changes to English criminal law. Most of it is still in force.
Several of the Act's provisions were adopted, word for word, for Northern Ireland by the Criminal Law Act (Northern Ireland) 1967 (c 18) (NI) and the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (Northern Ireland) 1968 (c 28) (NI). They were adopted for the Republic of Ireland by the Criminal Law Act 1997.
The Act has three parts. Part I abolished the distinction between felony and misdemeanour and makes consequential provisions. Part II abolished a number of obsolete crimes. Part III contains supplementary provisions.
==Part I - Felony and misdemeanour==

This Part implements the recommendations made by the Criminal Law Revision Committee in their seventh report.
Section 1 abolished the distinction between felonies and misdemeanours. Originally, all crimes in English law were categorised in a hierarchy of treason, felony, and misdemeanour, each with their own rules of procedure and evidence. (Treason had been brought in line with felony in 1945.) The 1967 Act abolished felonies and stated that all former felonies would be tried according to the rules of procedure and evidence that applied in trials and pre-trial hearings for misdemeanours, whether the felony had been committed before or after the Act was passed.〔Transitional provisions were contained in section 12.〕 This also had the effect of abolishing the offences of misprision of felony and compounding a felony (but these offences were replaced with new ones in sections 4 and 5). Although all offences were now misdemeanours, the maximum penalties were not affected.
Section 2 created a new category of arrestable offences, since powers of arrest had depended on whether an offence was a felony or a misdemeanour. Arrestable offences were defined as crimes for which the maximum sentence for an adult was five years or more. The section set out the circumstances in which a citizen or a constable could arrest somebody without a court warrant (police powers were more extensive than a civilian's).
Section 2 was repealed and replaced with section 24 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, which was broadly similar to section 2 but also applied to some less serious offences. Section 24 was supplemented by a section 25 which created new powers (for constables only) to arrest those suspected of "non-arrestable offences" in certain circumstances. Sections 24 and 25 were controversially amended by the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, which abolished the difference between arrestable and non-arrestable offences and substituted one set of police arrest powers for all offences, irrespective of the maximum sentence. Citizens' arrest was confined to indictable offences. This change took effect from 1 January 2006.
Section 3 replaces the common law rules on self-defence, such as the duty to retreat. It simply requires that any force used must be "reasonable in the circumstances." It is still in force today and states:
(Further provision about when force is "reasonable" was made by (section 76 ) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008.)
(詳細はSection 5(1) created a new offence which replaced misprision and compounding of felony. It stated that a person who has information which might lead to the prosecution of an arrestable offence and who agrees to accept consideration (other than compensation for the offence) in exchange for not disclosing that information to the authorities is liable to two years' imprisonment.
*When the concept of an "arrestable offence" was abolished, sections 4 and 5(1) were amended so that they now apply to any "relevant offence," which is defined in identical terms to the original 1967 definition of arrestable offence. This significantly reduced the scope of these offences from the wider 1984 definition, which had been steadily extended over the years.
*A person may not be prosecuted for these offences without the permission of the Director of Public Prosecutions or a Crown prosecutor.
Section 5(2) creates the offence commonly known as "wasting police time," committed by giving false information to the police "tending to show that an offence has been committed, or to give rise to apprehension for the safety of any persons or property, or tending to show that he has information material to any police inquiry." The maximum sentence is six months. A person may not be prosecuted for this offence without the permission of the Director of Public Prosecutions or a Crown prosecutor.
Section 5(5) provides that the compounding of an offence other than treason is not an offence otherwise than under section 5 of the Act. This means that:
* The common law offence of compounding treason is preserved.
* The common law offence of compounding a felony, and (if it existed) the common law offence of compounding a misdemeanour, were abolished on 1 January 1968. (In Working Paper No.72, at paragraph 43, the Law Commission suggest that the latter offence might "perhaps" have existed, but offer no explanation).
Consequential repeals on s.5(5) (s.10(2) and Sch 3, Pt III)
*Section 33 of the Metropolitan Police Courts Act 1839.
*Section 48 of the Pawnbrokers Act 1872.
Section 6 deals with the procedures for arraignment and verdict. In particular, it deals with ''alternative verdicts'' (or ''alternative pleas''). When a defendant is found not guilty of the offence he is charged with but is found guilty of a less serious offence (or he wishes to plead not guilty to the more serious offence but guilty to a lesser one), the section allows a verdict or plea of guilty to the lesser offence to be entered even though the offence may not be explicitly charged on the indictment. It also states if a defendant refuses to enter a plea then it defaults to ''not guilty.''
Section 7(5) (now repealed) abolished forfeiture of lands, goods and chattels, and abolished outlawry.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Criminal Law Act 1967」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.